[Sotff] Book 2 changes
Brad Murray
bjmurray.halfjack at gmail.com
Sun Mar 2 17:05:56 MST 2008
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Darren Brewster <excrusader at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think with a slight change to how you shaded it, the picture looks
> fine. My problem is that the back-top panel shading made it really
> difficult to determine what I was looking at at first. I think making
> that part unshaded like the front-top would make the illustration much
> clearer, at least in my mind.
Thanks for the ideas! Currently all the art in the project is original
and free (that is, it's all mine), so modifications are
straightforward.
> Besides, paying for art for a project that is using someone else's IP
> seems like it might be going overboard. Even if you require using
> actual Traveller books to play (I'm not sure what is required, as I
> haven't read through the documents yet, only followed posts on the
> Fate mailing list), it could get you in some hot water.
Currently I don't actually have anyone elses IP in the product with
the exception of the SotC SRD extracts, which are attributed according
to the OGL. I do need to put a copy of the OGL in, though, to keep
that clear. Our only concern right now is the degree to which the
format impinges upon trademarks, and weve been advised that Mongoose
will be able to talk to that Real Soon Now.
Our objective is to be able to play without a copy of Traveller, but
maybe not get the full effect (ship design, subsector mapping, world
generation, and animal generation are all deliberately left out of our
work and deferred to Traveller).
--
Brad Murray (halfjack)
More information about the Sotff
mailing list